Dear Mr. Gardner,
This letter is in response to Mr. Gardner’s enforcement of the “n-word” policy.
May 17, 2019
Dear Mr. Gardner,
On April 24th, 2019, classes halted under the barge of the intercom, greeted with a message intended to induce a call to action eliminating the usage of the word “nigger” here at Doherty High School. Classes fell silent. Minds raced. Yet, upon the completion of your tirade, mockery ensued. Not but five minutes after the end of the announcement did a plethora of memes, purposeful throwing of the term “nigga”, and a swarm of rumors over the warrant for the newly passed policy resounded across the school community. These reactions indicate a flaw in the message; however, the flaw arose not from the intention to eradicate hatred, but rather, the delivery of the message. The call for abolishing “nigga” from the halls of Doherty required more than a stern directive for our community to halt the word’s usage; instead, the method of delivery needed resolute educating of the horrendous history of the term and inclusion of other hate terminology, all delivered with a tone of positivity and empowerment. Therefore, this response to you, Mr. Gardner, operates as a tutorial to understanding your audience and speaking to them in a manner of productivity and unity. I ask you consider what follows as a model for approaching such a sensitive topic. So, here is what your students would have wanted to hear:
The term, “nigger”, originated in the eighteenth century, used to marginalize African slaves and instill the belief they lacked intellectual equality to European, white colonizers of the African continent. “Nigger” derives from the Spanish word, “negro”, but the use of the word escalated to hatred with the rise of slavery, genocide, and colonizers self-proclaimed assertion of superiority. The transfer of the word to America roots in racist ideology and degradation of African descent; the belief whites are intellectually greater to blacks, which white, American slaveowners utilized as a rhetorical strategy to instill into the minds of African slaves a defeatist mentality of submission. From its origin, “nigger” implies a power dynamic, and this power translates to today. When a black student says the term, “nigga”, to another black student, the power dynamic is neutral, a common bond of fair ground; however, when the term is used by a white student, the history emerges and the power is imbalanced, because, in many ways, the mentality of white superiority resonates as reality in our current society, beyond the walls of Doherty, beyond the city of Colorado Springs, beyond the state of Colorado, but globally. This mentality resides in the culture of American society, systematically, emotionally, and implicitly. “Nigger”, in contrast to “Nigga”, serves as a symbol for white power, which holds no place in Doherty, our community, or anywhere in the world, but this small gesture of banning the term proves microscopic in contrast to the stark reality most students of color and historically marginalized peoples experience and will continue to experience past graduation; however, we, as a Doherty community, reject and stand on the side of minimizing the impact of racist ideology and terminology as a small stance against a long history of demean.
Additionally, we extend our inclusion of all walks of life to acknowledge other groups experiencing the same power imbalance culturally rooted in hate. We stand with our Hispanic brothers and sisters, who under current political rule, fear a wall and false representation as criminals, rapists, drug dealers, and job stealers. We stand with our LGBT brothers and sisters as they navigate a world where phrases, like, “that’s gay” equates to, “that’s stupid”, perpetuating the idea queerness means something negative, and we cast-off the word, “faggot” for its equally horrific history and hateful intent. We stand with those with special needs, that one day, they will live without the word, “Retard”. We stand with any and all voices silenced from living their truth without the worry of judgement and attack. We, as Spartans, are people. First and foremost, a united people living for love and uplift. So, I ask each and every one of you to consider your words. Consider your intention. Consider the way you speak. Choose to lead with love. Though we may not hold the ability to eliminate the cultural prominence of racism and bigotry beyond our school. We can eliminate it within the walls of our Spartan arena, where every student deserves safety, the chance to learn, and the right to live their authentic truth.
Thank you, Mr. Gardner, for your time and consideration.
Mrs. Donna Jamison • May 23, 2019 at 10:28 am
I applaud your efforts in educating your readers. Likewise, I applaud Mr. Gardner for taking a stand. Clearly, DHS could benefit from a black history course. Note that you are sugarcoating slavery by using the word “marginalize” for this was not what happened. The N-word was used to “dehumanize” the black race, and this is still occurring today whether or not the word ends in an “a.” Jason is absolutely right that your use of the actual word is in itself unacceptable and offensive. Most news media outlets would not print the word. Last, there are many people in the black community who do not use the word in any form and would find it unacceptable that a public school would allow its students to openly use the word. Doherty should be a place where not only learning takes place, but a place where every single student can have a positive experience each and every day regardless of their race, religion, or sexual orientation. So, even if you think there is no harm in using the N-word with an “a,” you are sorely mistaken. Hopefully, we can have a diverse group to discuss this more next school year and bring positive changes to our school.
Sincerely,
Donna Jamison
adviser • May 23, 2019 at 11:01 am
Thank you for addressing this and adding to the conversation. We have a policy about what is acceptable to publish, and I share your concerns. After discussing the issue with our principal, I decided to allow the letter to the editor because it is intended to be part of the conversation of changing the culture here. We are waiting for Mr. Gardner’s response. The letter describes the different forms of the word in order to clarify and add to the conversation, not to offend.
Jason szretter • May 20, 2019 at 12:37 pm
Good way to get your point across but you didnt need to say the actual n word that many times
Nikolas • May 17, 2019 at 5:04 pm
I found this article well stated and quite potent in it’s meaning and the ideas presented. I, however, disliked the lack of mention of the amount of empowerment announcements such as Mr. Gardener’s gives to a word. I would argue that the approach more effectively taken is not to eradicate the words or to ignore them, but to educate, as was stated, and accept that these words as part of the vernacular of the times. This way, we, as a group, can be the ‘bigger person’ and not allow ourselves to be offended all. By denouncing single words or particular usage is to set it upon a pedestal of taboo- this is not how we fight the “culturally rooted power imbalance.”
Na • May 17, 2019 at 3:32 pm
I appreciate the history. Also the critique, but bringing LGBT into this kinda just hit a cord. People are allowed under the first amendment and the policy of freedom of speech as in you can say words or actions as long as it does not disrupt the learning environment. People are going to say Faggot, and Retard, those are words that should be implied on the use if the sentence. I.e That’s just restarted can equate to that is just dumb, but saying That kid is retarded can differ. To be “Faggot” can hit a gray zone. Now the n word I can agree it is racist no matter the intent and has a horrible history to it. This applies when two black students say it too. It is a racist word. But what do I know its 2019 Opinions are violence
Will • May 17, 2019 at 2:42 pm
I really appreciate that you expanded upon derogatory slurs and are standing with other groups of people facing this type of attack.
Iman • May 17, 2019 at 2:26 pm
I agree but I think my biggest issue is that a white man thinks he can tell me and my people that I can’t say nigga? He is way out of his lane that is not his place and I do not respect or appreciate that at all. I think his heart is in the right place but also he has no right to even be involved in that conversation period. It’s one that needs to happen with us and has nothing to do with him.
Abby • May 17, 2019 at 1:47 pm
I love the historical context that they provided, it made the situation a learning opportunity rather than a message that only increased the use of the word.
Cade • May 17, 2019 at 1:44 pm
I like that they approached it with an educated attitude as opposed to a “stop now” kinda feel
Ashlyn Graves • May 17, 2019 at 1:44 pm
I love that someone at Doherty actually addressed this in a mature manner and we definitely should have done this in the first place.
Molly • May 17, 2019 at 1:41 pm
This is really how the issue should have been brought up, using education rather than just saying to should have happened another way.
Kenton • May 17, 2019 at 12:16 pm
I enjoyed how you included the different issues that we all hear everyday to further support your claim. I also liked the example of how the message should have been given to the students as a critique to the technique that was used.
Ashlin Dvorak • May 17, 2019 at 11:14 am
I love the way you worded this whole essay and to be honest if it was said like this over the announcements then maybe this whole “issue” wouldn’t have arose. maybe it would even be a learning experience.
Mackenzie Summers • May 17, 2019 at 11:13 am
This is amazing, I really appreciate somebody at Doherty who is maturely taking a stand.
Ana Meidl • May 17, 2019 at 9:17 am
I like that you critique instead of attack. This is a very mature response and provides a great point of view from all parties on this issue.
Leighton • May 17, 2019 at 8:39 am
Very well put! Way to back up your argument maturely and efficiently!
Lauren Pepin • May 17, 2019 at 8:38 am
I appreciate your approach of education rather than attack, and that is how the issue should have been brought upon in the first place.